by Mary Finn » Thu Jul 20, 2006 2:54 pm
This subject is another tough one - as the least environmentally damaging option would be for most of us to stay close to home. But does anyone know of a viable ' virtual' tourism project, based on blogging or use of flickr for example?
In the absence of that extreme, what are the things that can be controlled or influenced by ecotourism operators? We could investigate and encourage the use of the most environmentally friendly local transports (buses? - though in Ecuador the smoke these spew out make me doubt this is best; shared rides instead of single hired cars? bicycling, horseback riding where possible?) Getting people to stay in one place longer perhaps (instead of the stereotypical American 'if this is Tuesday I must be in Belgium' whirlwind tour?) Also we should make it even more of a priority to buy locally to minimize trips for provisions.
All of these are hard and involve some sacrifice of convenience or comfort on the part of visitors (who seem more rushed and impatient these days and if anything, rather less likely to be willing to 'hang out' waiting for a shared ride.) In the part of rural Ecuador where I worked and lived, economics and increasing prosperity from ecotourism itself has resulted in much higher auto & truck ownership, so that even locals who used to walk a few kilometers or so, or ride a mule or bike, or catch a ride in the back of the milk truck, now routinely pay a dollar or so to contract a separate ride. This of course is progress from the locals' standpoint. And it's hard to criticize this when they are merely imitating what they see visitors doing.
On planting trees, I understand there are controversies about carbon offsets, that among other things these let the polluters off the hook. But does that mean that we shouldn't for example, make planting a tree or two part of the visiting experience for each ecotourist? Are there any other small (or even biggish) steps that ecotourism operators could take?
Mary